W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webont-comments@w3.org > August 2004

RE: An inconsistency in OWL XML Presentation Syntax?

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2004 01:56:24 -0500
To: "Uschold, Michael F" <michael.f.uschold@boeing.com>
Cc: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>, Motik@fzi.de, public-swbp-wg@w3.org, public-webont-comments@w3.org
Message-Id: <1092898584.24652.81.camel@dirk>

On Wed, 2004-08-18 at 19:16, Uschold, Michael F wrote:
> It seems to me that minimally, there should be a summary of known
> errors/bugs/problems with OWL that is pointed to in a clear obvious
> (i.e. hard to miss) manner in the official OWL document pages. This
> current problem would go on that list.
>
> If there is no mechanism for this to occur, it seems like an oversight.

We maintain errata for the Recommendations...
  http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/WebOnt/errata

but we don't promise to maintain WG Notes. Again, from the status
section:

> "The authors welcome comments on this document, but does not guarantee a
> reply or any further action. [...] no commitment is made by the W3C, or
> any of its members, regarding future updates."
>   -- http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/NOTE-owl-xmlsyntax-20030611/

-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Thursday, 19 August 2004 06:56:19 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 5 February 2014 07:16:01 UTC