W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webont-comments@w3.org > September 2003

Re: Using OWL

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2003 07:47:04 -0500
To: Jim Hendler <hendler@cs.umd.edu>
Cc: "Illarramendi Echave. Arantxa" <jipileca@si.ehu.es>, public-webont-comments@w3.org, Frank van Harmelen <Frank.van.Harmelen@cs.vu.nl>
Message-Id: <1063975624.23396.17.camel@dirk.dm93.org>

On Fri, 2003-09-19 at 07:23, Jim Hendler wrote:
> At 10:55 AM +0200 9/19/03, Illarramendi Echave. Arantxa wrote:
> >We have used OWL to write OperOnt ontology.
> >(http://siul02.si.ehu.es/Aingeru/OperOnt.owl)

Thanks for letting us know about this work.

I see some details that are probably not as
you intended:




per http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-ref/#owl-uri-namespace

Also, where you write

	<owl:Class rdf:about="file:/C:/Aingeru/OperOnt/actors#Actor">

I think you mean


You might try some of the syntax checking tools from
our implementation report
for example

which reports problems such as

 [line=134:column=-1] URI
'file:/C:/Aingeru/OperOnt/actors#ConditionChecker Agent' cannot be
resolved against curent base URI

Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Friday, 19 September 2003 08:47:11 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:09:29 UTC