On Fri, 2003-09-19 at 07:23, Jim Hendler wrote: > At 10:55 AM +0200 9/19/03, Illarramendi Echave. Arantxa wrote: > >We have used OWL to write OperOnt ontology. > >(http://siul02.si.ehu.es/Aingeru/OperOnt.owl) Thanks for letting us know about this work. I see some details that are probably not as you intended: xmlns:owl="http://www.w3.org/??/owl#" Try xmlns:owl="http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#" per http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-ref/#owl-uri-namespace Also, where you write <owl:Class rdf:about="file:/C:/Aingeru/OperOnt/actors#Actor"> I think you mean <owl:Class rdf:about="http://siul02.si.ehu.es/Aingeru/OperOnt.owl#Actor"> You might try some of the syntax checking tools from our implementation report http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/WebOnt/impls#Implementations for example http://phoebus.cs.man.ac.uk:9999/OWL/Validator which reports problems such as [line=134:column=-1] URI 'file:/C:/Aingeru/OperOnt/actors#ConditionChecker Agent' cannot be resolved against curent base URI http://siul02.si.ehu.es/Aingeru/OperOnt.owl -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/Received on Friday, 19 September 2003 08:47:11 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:19:15 GMT