- From: Saied Tazari <saied.tazari@zgdv.de>
- Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2003 09:50:24 +0100
- To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Cc: public-webont-comments@w3.org
Dan Connolly wrote: > . > . > Coincidentally, part/whole relationships is one of the first > things we've started writing about in this context: > http://esw.w3.org/topic/PartWhole > . > . > SW Best Practices WG - draft charter for discussion > Guus Schreiber (Monday, 10 November) > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2003Nov/0055.html > > > Does it seem satisfactory to take up your suggestion in > a later stage of work? Note the OWL drafts have been > out since March 2002 and we were really hoping > to get all comments on the OWL specs in by 20 September 2003. Thank you very much for the introduced links. I'm relieved to hear that this is already a discussion point in the SW community. It also shows that the deferment of the suggestion was not that wrong: as I had guessed, there were others who missed this fundamental feature but waited for the next round of discussions :-) -- Saied
Received on Thursday, 27 November 2003 03:51:15 UTC