W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webont-comments@w3.org > November 2003

Re: Weak entity classes and the part-of association

From: Saied Tazari <saied.tazari@zgdv.de>
Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2003 09:50:24 +0100
Message-ID: <3FC5BAD0.2060004@zgdv.de>
To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Cc: public-webont-comments@w3.org

Dan Connolly wrote:
> .
> .
> Coincidentally, part/whole relationships is one of the first
> things we've started writing about in this context:
>   http://esw.w3.org/topic/PartWhole
> .
> .
>   SW Best Practices WG - draft charter for discussion 
>   Guus Schreiber (Monday, 10 November)
>   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2003Nov/0055.html
> Does it seem satisfactory to take up your suggestion in
> a later stage of work? Note the OWL drafts have been
> out since March 2002 and we were really hoping
> to get all comments on the OWL specs in by 20 September 2003.

Thank you very much for the introduced links.  I'm relieved to hear that 
this is already a discussion point in the SW community.  It also shows 
that the deferment of the suggestion was not that wrong: as I had 
guessed, there were others who missed this fundamental feature but 
waited for the next round of discussions :-)

-- Saied
Received on Thursday, 27 November 2003 03:51:15 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:43:29 GMT