W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webont-comments@w3.org > November 2003

Fwd: Request to OWL implementors

From: Jim Hendler <hendler@cs.umd.edu>
Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2003 07:15:22 -0500
Message-Id: <p05200f10bbe3b22a2963@[]>
To: public-webont-comments@w3.org

Please note the following from Jeremy Carroll:

Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2003 10:21:21 +0000
>From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
>X-Accept-Language: en-gb
>To: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, yzou1@cs.umbc.edu,
>         "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>,
>         jack.berkowitz@networkinference.com,
>         Dave Reynolds <der@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, www-webont-wg@w3.org
>CC: mhgrove@hotmail.com, bparsia@isis.unc.edu, hendler@cs.umd.edu
>Subject: Request to OWL implementors
>X-HPL-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the Helpdesk for more 
>X-HPL-MailScanner: Found to be clean
>X-HPL-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam (whitelisted),
>	SpamAssassin (score=-5.4, required 5, BAYES_01 -5.40,
>X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on
>	dormouse.cs.umd.edu
>X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=ham version=2.60
>(Addressed to, I hope, all implementors who have reported test results)
>Thanks for your earlier reports concerning the OWL Test Cases.
>We are now wrapping up the test results before, hopefully, moving 
>OWL to Proposed Recommendation.
>A few tests have been added or changed, and we do not yet have 
>enough reports to support approving them. Please can you run your 
>systems against these tests and report back.
>Options for reporting back include:
>1) running the whole test suite and updating your test results, 
>which will then be picked up automatically.
>2) running just these tests and reporting by e-mail with 
>Pass/Fail/Incomplete ... E-mail can either be in response to this 
>message (on the webont list or to public-webont-comments@w3.org)
>(1 is preferred)
>The new and modified tests which we would like you to consider are:
>   Thing-003
>   Thing-005
>   description-logic-208
>   description-logic-209
>   description-logic-668
>   miscellaneous-010
>   miscellaneous-011
>further we were surprised at the lack of results for the following 
>tests, may be running your system with a larger timeout or similar 
>may resolve these ones:
>   description-logic-666
>   description-logic-905
>   description-logic-909
>(If you succeed on either of the last two, you could try 906, 910 
>and 907. All of them require implementation of finiteness. The 
>textual description of 907 is erroneous, and will be fixed next week 
>some time)
>It would be most helpful if you can report back by Wednesday 26th 
>Nov, so that we can ask the Working Group to approve these tests on 
>thank you
>Jeremy Carroll on behalf of Test subgroup of WebOnt WG
Professor James Hendler			  http://www.cs.umd.edu/users/hendler
Director, Semantic Web and Agent Technologies	  301-405-2696
Maryland Information and Network Dynamics Lab.	  301-405-6707 (Fax)
Univ of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742	  240-277-3388 (Cell)
Received on Friday, 21 November 2003 07:18:01 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:09:29 UTC