- From: Jim Hendler <hendler@cs.umd.edu>
- Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2003 10:09:40 -0500
- To: public-webont-comments@w3.org
it is the opinion of the chair of WOWG (me) that we have now met all of our exit criteria (modulo potential change in RDF) and thus I am going to begin preparing materials for our eventual move to Proposed Recommendation -- one thing that would help is if the implementors of OWL reasoners, ontologies, or etc. were to share with us their experiences -- this is especially valuable (but not limited to) those who have contributed their results to our test documents. We are expecially interested in feedback with respect to whether you were able to implement the langauge based on the documents (were we clear), were there other people's tools, products, techniques you found valuable, and how long did it take you and how hard was it (in qualitative terms is fine). Unclear to me exactly how I will use this information, but I would prefer responses to this list, and in public, so that I am free to forward what you write to the Working Group and/or other W3C lists. thanks Jim Hendler p.s. Please feel free (and encouraged) to circulate this message to all and sundry who may have implemented in this space -- Professor James Hendler hendler@cs.umd.edu Director, Semantic Web and Agent Technologies 301-405-2696 Maryland Information and Network Dynamics Lab. 301-405-6707 (Fax) Univ of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742 *** 240-277-3388 (Cell) http://www.cs.umd.edu/users/hendler *** NOTE CHANGED CELL NUMBER ***
Received on Friday, 7 November 2003 10:09:51 UTC