W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webont-comments@w3.org > May 2003

RE: Missing AllDisjoint?

From: Bernard Vatant <bernard.vatant@mondeca.com>
Date: Wed, 14 May 2003 17:56:25 +0200
To: "wwmm" <wwmm@seu.edu.cn>, <public-webont-comments@w3.org>
Message-ID: <PHENKPMFEPGEMOCCHNFPAEABCCAA.bernard.vatant@mondeca.com>


I've not seen any answer to this question, or maybe I missed it, but I
agree that having AllDisjoint would be very useful, since partition is a
frequent situation, very heavy to deal with using n^2 DisjointWith ...

Bernard Vatant
Senior Consultant
Knowledge Engineering
Mondeca - www.mondeca.com
bernard.vatant@mondeca.com


> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : public-webont-comments-request@w3.org
> [mailto:public-webont-comments-request@w3.org]De la part de wwmm
> Envoyé : lundi 12 mai 2003 04:13
> À : public-webont-comments@w3.org
> Objet : Missing AllDisjoint?
>
> Hello,
>
> Since there is an owl:AllDifferent, why is there not an
> owl:AllDisjoint?  It means that all class disjoint with each other.
> e.g.
>
>  <owl:AllDisjoint>
>     <owl:distinctMembers rdf:parseType="Collection">
>       <vin:WineSugar rdf:about="#LateHarvest" />
>       <vin:WineSugar rdf:about="#EarlyHarvest" />
>     </owl:distinctMembers>
> </owl:AllDisjoint>
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> wwmm
> wwmm@seu.edu.cn
>
Received on Wednesday, 14 May 2003 11:56:36 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:43:28 GMT