> At 17:33 +0200 5/6/03, Bernard Vatant wrote: > >Well, I was just about to send a comment along the same general lines, the > >notion of "rights" in OWL. In real-world applications, one will need the > >built-in ability to manage rights of access and edition on the information, > >based on users profiles, definition of workspaces, and the like. > > Please note that while with P3P there is a vocabulary on privacy that one can use, there is no rights description language backed by a large consensus. You might be interested to look into ODRL[1] and XMCL[2], two submitted rights-languages. 1. http://www.w3.org/Submission/2002/06 2. http://www.w3.org/Submission/2002/05 -- Rigo Wenning W3C/ERCIM Policy Analyst Privacy Activity Lead mail:rigo@w3.org 2004, Routes des Lucioles http://www.w3.org/ F-06902 Sophia AntipolisReceived on Wednesday, 7 May 2003 03:03:21 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:43:28 GMT