At 1:19 PM +0200 6/27/03, Davide Noaro wrote: Hi, I don't understand why in owl:imports you didn't put an attribute to set up a shorthand notation for names of the elements imported. There is a redundancy between the namespace declarations and owl:imports statements like in DAML.... why you didn't add an attribute like in SHOE to specify the prefix of the elements? Is there a motivation that giustify the redundancy? Thank you in advance for you answers, Davide. ----------------------------------------------------------- Davide Noaro <mailto:noarodavide@libero.it>noarodavide@libero.it ------------------------------------------------------------ Davide - this mailing list is primarily intended, at this point, for the Last Call comments on OWL documents - and the last call on the reference and semantics closed more than a month ago. I'm taking the liberty of forwarding your mail to ww-rdf-logic@w3.org which is where our documents suggest discussion of issues such as this. -Jim HendlerReceived on Friday, 27 June 2003 09:03:55 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:19:14 GMT