W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webont-comments@w3.org > June 2003

Re: OWL Abstract Syntax and Semantics review comments

From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2003 11:41:30 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <20030613.114130.123581159.pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
To: Jan.Grant@bristol.ac.uk
Cc: public-webont-comments@w3.org

Here is a reply for the unanswered issue in your message.

> --- owlsas-rdfcore-unnamed-ontologies
> Section 3.4
> Unnamed ontologies: informally, multiple Annontations on an unnamed
> ontology don't need to be satisfied by the same "x" according to this
> table. Don't think that's right.

The newest editor's draft of S&AS (of 4 June 2003, available at
http://www-db.research.bell-labs.com/usr/pfps/owl/) has a new Section 3.4
that should satisfactorily address this issue.

The basic change is that the interpretation of Ontology Annotations is done
in an environment where there is a resource for the ontology, named or not
as evidenced by the following wording:

	there is some o &isin; R such that 
	for each Ontology Annotation of the form
	<span class="syntax">Annotation(</span>p v<span class="syntax">)</span>,
	&lt;o,S(v)&gt; &isin; ER(p)
	and that if O has name n, then 
	S(n) = o;

Please reply to this message as to whether this response is satisfactory,
copying public-webont-wg@w3.org. Again, thank you for your comments.

Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Bell Labs Research
Lucent Technologies
Received on Friday, 13 June 2003 11:41:49 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:09:29 UTC