W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webont-comments@w3.org > April 2003

Re: OWL Language Reference Comments

From: Guus Schreiber <schreiber@cs.vu.nl>
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2003 07:40:16 +0100
Message-ID: <3EA4E3D0.1090107@cs.vu.nl>
To: "Lacy . Lee" <LLacy@drc.com>
CC: public-webont-comments@w3.org

Dera Lacy Lee,

Thanks very much for your detailed comments. We will consider them and 
get back to you.

Guus Schreiber
WOWG co-chair


Lacy . Lee wrote:

> OWL Language Reference Comments
> 
> Minor editorial suggestions:
> 
> Section 1.1, change "This document" to "That document" or fully qualified
> name to reduce confusion.
> Section 1.1, change "uses cases" to "use cases".
> Section 3, "Note" first sentence appears to be combination of two separate
> sentences?
> Section 3.1.1, example would be easier to understand if it was a named class
> "Continent".
> Section 4.2, change "with as both" to "with both".
> Section 4.3, change "the a range" to "the range".
> Section 5.2, change "where class" to "where a class".
> Section 7.1, change "property is OWL DL" to "property in OWL DL".
> Section 8.3, the tabs in the example should be lined up differently to show
> indentation at the same levels.
> 
> More substantive comments/questions:
> 
> Section Numbering: I'm not sure what the W3C format restrictions are, but it
> would be easier to "reference" sections of this reference document if
> headings were numbered below the 3rd level.
> 
> The examples in section 3.1.3 for the intersectionOf and unionOf properties
> don't seem like they represent typical uses of the properties (manipulating
> explicit enumerations).
> 
> The text in section 3.2.2 appears to suggest that the equivalentClass
> statement is required to define an enumerated class, rather than just naming
> a type 2 enumeration like the one described in section 3.1.1.
> 
> Section 4.1's NOTE: says in OWL DL the domain and range of the subPropertyOf
> property must be either both datatype properties or object properties, but I
> would think the note would also apply to OWL Lite?
> 
> Section 4.2 states that owl:inverseOf is a symmetric property.  Does it
> really mean that defining one direction is sufficient to infer that the
> inverse property has the described property as its inverse property?  That's
> a different notion than the owl:SymmetricProperty construct.
> 
> Section 5.2 describes owl:AllDifferent as a "special OWL class" .  From the
> NOTE, it's not clear whether the domain of the owl:distinctMembers property
> is restricted to the owl:AllDifferent class.
> 
> Section 6.2, it isn't clear whether "owl:DataRange" is a "special OWL class"
> like "owl:AllDifferent".
> 
> Section 7.1 introduces the concept of annotations.  I don't recall them
> being described in the overview or guide, so a one sentence
> definition/introduction would be helpful.  Also, it's confusing why "an
> explicit typing triple" with a particular form is specified rather than
> providing example owl syntax.
> 
> Section 7.4 has an example of DeprecatedProperty whose comment references
> its inverse property "drives".   However, the inverseProperty still
> references the deprecated class.  I would expect the inverseOf property to
> be specified as part of the dying hasDriver property.
> 
> Section 8 describes the differences in OWL species, however I have not seen
> whether the intended species is ever formally specified in documents.  For
> example, the OWL namespaces referenced by OWL Lite ontologies appear to be
> the same ones for OWL Full.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 

-- 
NOTE: new affiliation per April 1, 2003

Free University Amsterdam, Computer Science
De Boelelaan 1081a, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 444 7739/7718
E-mail: schreiber@cs.vu.nl
Home page: http://www.cs.vu.nl/~guus/ [under construction]
Received on Tuesday, 22 April 2003 02:40:09 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:43:27 GMT