Hi there, A few small nitpicks regarding some of the latest OWL documents, feel free to use at will... Re: http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/WD-owl-features-20030331/ 3 (second paragraph): - Incomplete sentence; [[[... are also only allowed between named classes, ...]]]. 3.4: - The example for allValuesFrom could benefit from being one having the domain being different from the range (for clarity) Re: http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/WD-owl-guide-20030331/ 3.1.1: - The rdf:ID reference example says that [[[Other ontologies may reference this name using its complete form, "http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/WebOnt/guide-src/wine#Region".]]], but since there is no xml:base declaration, they can't do that (in a reliable fashion), right? 5.2: - rdf:label for #White should be rdfs:label.Received on Saturday, 19 April 2003 07:29:50 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:09:28 UTC