W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webont-comments@w3.org > September 2002

named cardinalities [was: Forwarding comments from Bobrow at Parc ]

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: 19 Sep 2002 22:38:54 -0500
To: Deborah McGuinness <dlm@ksl.stanford.edu>
Cc: public-webont-comments@w3.org, bobrow@parc.com
Message-Id: <1032493134.1670.8.camel@dirk>

On Thu, 2002-09-19 at 16:58, Deborah McGuinness wrote:
> From: bobrow@parc.com
> To: public-webont-comments-request@w3.org
> Subject: Support for OWL-lite and full OWL
> Date: 17 Sep 2002 11:17:37 -0700
[...]

> I think it would be useful to perhaps simplify the notation even further 
> -- by making the special cases of cardinality restriction be named
> (for example no-filler, functional, no-more-than-one, at-least-one).
> Although this is not the same notation as full-OWL there is a direct
> translation, and OWL-lite should be easy to read for someone not well
> versed in the art.

Yes, I tend to agree; thanks for the prod (again). I keep
forgetting to raise this with the WG; see also:

Re: Feature synopsis: content comments (named cardinalities)
From: Dan Connolly (connolly@w3.org)
Date: Wed, Sep 04 2002
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webont-comments/2002Sep/0005.html

-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Thursday, 19 September 2002 23:38:57 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:43:27 GMT