W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webont-comments@w3.org > October 2002

OWL Abstract Syntax

From: Sean Bechhofer <seanb@cs.man.ac.uk>
Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2002 11:08:38 +0100 (GMT Daylight Time)
To: public-webont-comments@w3.org
Message-ID: <Pine.WNT.4.44.0210031101060.2140-100000@potato>

Some brief comments on the latest version of the OWL Abstract Syntax
document (prompted by trying to use the abstract syntax in a tutorial
style document).

o The mixed use of "feature=X" and "feature(X)" forms is ugly and
  potentially confusing -- e.g. cardinalities use "()" and someValuesFrom
  uses "=". Why not stick to one or the other?

o There are places where parsing could be unnecessarily tricky, i.e.,
  something like "union ( person restriction (...))" where restriction
  could actually be a class called restriction or the start of some restriction

Tidying up the syntax a little and adopting some consistent conventions
(e.g. keywords always followed by parentheses) should alleviate both these
problems I think.



Sean Bechhofer
Received on Thursday, 3 October 2002 06:05:48 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:09:28 UTC