- From: Jeff Jaffe <jeff@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2014 14:49:47 -0400
- To: Brian Kardell <bkardell@gmail.com>, public-openw3c@w3.org, Webizen TF <public-webizen@w3.org>
On 9/4/2014 1:30 PM, Brian Kardell wrote: > It feels a little sleazy to share blog posts on a ML, Not at all. > but I spent a > great deal of time considering how to formulate and phrase ideas that > I would have otherwise simply done here, so I'm going to go ahead and > do it in this case. Feel free to beat me up. > > (about generalized approach in 'tightening the feedback loop' - > totally complimentary to standards bodies) > https://medium.com/@briankardell/web-standards-we-want-part-i-chapters-ca71985bf914 > > (about a proposal relevant to Webizen, but more generally something > that the W3C could take up to enable something for the good of the Web > which goes significantly beyond any particular standards body) > https://medium.com/@briankardell/the-web-standards-we-need-part-ii-guilds-cgs-1cd61b115751 Some of these ideas we currently have under consideration for Webizens (e.g. I see the "Developer Groups" in the current questionnaire to be similar in spirit to your Chapters in Blog I). Would you agree? Other ideas (e.g. CG++) go beyond. Will you be at TPAC? It would be great if we could have an unconference session around the CG++ idea. There are probably some issues that we should explore (e.g. CG's don't compel IP commitments from companies that hold the IP - but we really need that for WGs). > >
Received on Thursday, 4 September 2014 18:49:56 UTC