Re: filling in minutes

On Wed, 20 Aug 2014 17:50:27 +0200, Brian Kardell <bkardell@gmail.com>  
wrote:

> Currently minutes look like they missed something
>
> ------------
> Brian: on the legal aspect, currently a lot happens in public mailing  
> lists
>
> <AnnBassetti> I think I like the bicameral possibility of structure
> (upper / lower houses)
>
> Brian: some even avoid W3C discussion and bring back stuff later to W3C
>
> <MarkCrawford> Unfortunately I need to drop
>
> Brian: how can we currently have individuals@@@[missed]
> ... Where is the legal argument?
> ... IEs are individuals but they don't represent anybody
>
> -------
>
> @@@[missed]
> What I was saying there was in regard to Mark's concerns about IPR
> agreements with individuals being the problem, merely pointing out
> that individuals participate as invited experts, on mailing lists,
> CGs, twitter and on IRC channels that both do and don't belong to W3C
> - and we have open source orgs and individuals that participate as
> first class today.  If we can solve those issues to satisfaction,
> surely we can do the same here.

Thanks, Brian,

I've replaced that bit in the minutes, which I'll send next.

Coralie


-- 
  Coralie Mercier  -  W3C Communications Team  -  http://www.w3.org
mailto:coralie@w3.org +336 4322 0001 http://www.w3.org/People/CMercier/

Received on Wednesday, 20 August 2014 16:15:38 UTC