- From: Jacopo Scazzosi <jacopo@scazzosi.com>
- Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2023 14:09:07 +0200
- To: Martynas Jusevičius <martynas@atomgraph.com>
- Cc: Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com>, Jonas Smedegaard <jonas@jones.dk>, public-webid <public-webid@w3.org>
> How can this group finalize anything if the same arguments are > rehashed and ignored over and over again? > https://github.com/w3c/WebID/issues/3 > https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webid/2022Jan/0114.html I think we can look at that thread in a much more optimistic light. Just consider that it dates back to Jan 2022. TallTed’s proposal https://github.com/w3c/WebID/issues/3#issuecomment-1051064330, which relaxes the requirement on any given format, is from Feb 2022. I refer to it in https://github.com/w3c/WebID/issues/3#issuecomment-1279931734 , which is from Oct 2022. Of course some of us would like for there to be _no mention whatsoever_ of suggested formats. Others would like to see a few MUSTs on one or more specific formats. It is said that a good compromise makes everyone tolerably unhappy. I think we were very close to a good compromise.
Received on Friday, 16 June 2023 12:09:28 UTC