- From: Henry Story <henry.story@co-operating.systems>
- Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2015 08:12:34 +0200
- To: Anders Rundgren <anders.rundgren.net@gmail.com>
- Cc: Andrei Sambra <andrei@w3.org>, public-webid@w3.org
> On 31 Jul 2015, at 17:25, Anders Rundgren <anders.rundgren.net@gmail.com> wrote: > > On 2015-07-31 15:47, Andrei Sambra wrote: >> I’ve already started work (this spring) on an alternative auth > > protocol based on WebID, which uses the new WebCrypto API. You can read about it here [0]. > > Pardon my ignorance but I don't understand how WebID-RSA works since > WebCrypto is SOP-crippled. That you can generate a key on the fly > is true but exactly what does that buy? What does SOP-cripled mean? > > Anders > >> >> It’s currently implemented in gold [1], one of the SoLiD servers. >> >> —Andrei >> >> [0] https://github.com/linkeddata/SoLiD#webid-rsa >> [1] https://github.com/linkeddata/gold >> >>> On Jul 31, 2015, at 8:51 AM, Cory Sabol <cssabol@uncg.edu <mailto:cssabol@uncg.edu>> wrote: >>> >>> It would be interesting to conduct some work on that. WebID with some alternative crypto APIs. >>> >>> On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 6:42 AM, Andreas Kuckartz <a.kuckartz@ping.de <mailto:a.kuckartz@ping.de>> wrote: >>> >>> Kingsley Idehen wrote: >>> > Keygen doesn't define existence of WebID-TLS. It just offered a >>> > perceived convenience. >>> >>> Can WebID-TLS be based on the Web Cryptography API instead? >>> >>> What would be the advantages and disadvantages? >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Andreas >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Regards, >>> >>> -Cory Sabol >>> cssabol@uncg.edu <mailto:cssabol@uncg.edu> >>> >> > >
Received on Tuesday, 4 August 2015 06:13:07 UTC