Re: FYI: proposal for client authentication in TLS

On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 9:20 AM, henry.story@bblfish.net <
henry.story@bblfish.net> wrote:

>
> On 10 Mar 2014, at 13:56, Tim Holborn <timothy.holborn@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> oh - typo on front page:
>
> http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/webid/spec/
>
>
>    - it should allow flexbile access control that is both easy for humans
>    and machines to use and understand,
>
>
> vs.
>
>    - it should allow flexible access control that is both easy for humans
>    and machines to use and understand,
>
> fixed in Mercurial. I also found a mistake in the TLS spec which I also
> pushed to Mercurial.
> Both of these are small enough that they could be fixed directly in CVS
> too.
>
> As it happens CVS version at http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/webid/spec/
> should have a pointer to the mercurial developers draft, and the same with
> the other two specs
> where that pointer is no longer correct.
>

These are all good catches.
http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/webid/spec/has been updated with all
those fixes...

Steph.

Received on Tuesday, 11 March 2014 01:19:45 UTC