Re: Domain of :key

On 3/29/13 11:51 AM, Melvin Carvalho wrote:
>
>
> On 29 March 2013 16:41, Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com 
> <mailto:kidehen@openlinksw.com>> wrote:
>
>     On 3/29/13 11:28 AM, Melvin Carvalho wrote:
>
>         Fair enough, but I think I have enough now to start working.
>          Once you see agents making payments you may change your mind.
>
>         You seem to be resistant to even slight changes in the cert
>         ontology (which I had thought was a community effort).  This
>         does indeed make me think that using something else such as
>         the sec ontology and/or making my own makes more sense.
>
>         We can just raise the domain of cert : key ( foaf : Agent or
>         rdfs : Resource )  with the group and reach a consensus.
>
>
>     The Web of Linked Data is fork friendly due to it being inherently
>     "horses for courses" compliant. Just make your own ontology and
>     hook into relevant bits of relevant third party ontologies, when
>     modelling a specific world view.
>
>     The biggest misconception we have re. the Semantic Web is the
>     notion of a golden ontology. There's no such thing as perfect data
>     and as a result there can never be a perfect ontology.
>
>     Building and using an ontology is the quickest part to ironing out
>     quirks. It trumps mailing list debates any day.
>
>     Everything on the Web ultimately speaks for itself via adoption :-)
>
>
> Kingsley, totally agree.
>
> I simply wanted to reuse where possible, to avoid reinventing the wheel.
>
> Not not be a debate, and I dont even think there has been one :)

Okay, all you need to do it make you derivative ontology and the share 
its URI. That ultimately aids evaluation for all parties that are 
interested :-)

For instance, I know certificates (entity type: rdf:Resource) and keys 
(entity type: rdf:Resource) are related via a "has" relation. I know 
agents (entity type: foaf:Agent) and certificates are related via an 
"owns" relation. That said, it's unclear to me if that's what's being 
discussed/debated .


Kingsley
>
>
>
>     -- 
>
>     Regards,
>
>     Kingsley Idehen
>     Founder & CEO
>     OpenLink Software
>     Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
>     Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen
>     <http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/%7Ekidehen>
>     Twitter/Identi.ca handle: @kidehen
>     Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about
>     LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen
>
>
>
>
>
>


-- 

Regards,

Kingsley Idehen	
Founder & CEO
OpenLink Software
Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen
Twitter/Identi.ca handle: @kidehen
Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about
LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen