- From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Date: Mon, 01 Apr 2013 13:12:13 -0400
- To: public-webid@w3.org
- Message-ID: <5159BFED.6000106@openlinksw.com>
On 4/1/13 12:23 PM, Melvin Carvalho wrote: > > Put that way we are getting closer to something I can agree with. > But the use case for the relation from owl:Thing to the public key > needs to be developed. This use case will probably help work out > what the name of the relation should be and what its meaning would > need to be. > > > Clearly, the term used to relate anyURI to an key should be "key" > > One other point arises. Should WebID/TLS have a dependency on FOAF. > This would exclude people like facebook etc. At this juncture, best we sort out the relation sought. Once that's resolved everything else should fall into place, logically :-) -- Regards, Kingsley Idehen Founder & CEO OpenLink Software Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen Twitter/Identi.ca handle: @kidehen Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen
Attachments
- application/pkcs7-signature attachment: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Received on Monday, 1 April 2013 17:12:36 UTC