Re: [foaf-protocols] [foaf-dev] WebID support for Node.js

On 4 October 2012 14:11, ☮ elf Pavlik ☮ <perpetual-tripper@wwelves.org>wrote:

> Excerpts from Baptiste Lafontaine's message of 2012-01-21 11:51:59 +0000:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I'm one of the authors of this report. It's the report of our end of year
> > project. It's currently not finished but I hope that it will help some
> > people.
> >
> > With the work of Antonio Garrote, we made this WebID library:
> > https://github.com/magnetik/node-webid
> > It currently using a web service to translate RDF/XML to Turtle because
> of
> > the lack of good RDF/XML parser in JavaScript. I plan to change this
> after
> > the exam.
> > This module is published on npm:  http://search.npmjs.org/#/webid
> >
> > I've just comited some change. Any comments are welcome.
>

Is this any help as an RDF parser?

https://github.com/linkeddata/rdflib.js/blob/master/rdfparser.js


> Hi Baptiste,
>
> Have you done any further work on WebID + Node.js?
>
> I consider experimenting with variant of http://remotestorage.io using
> WebID instead of OAuth and would like to use Node.js for implementing a
> storage server.
>
> Cheers!
>
>
> >
> > Regards,
> > --
> > Baptiste Lafontaine
> > Etudiant Télécom SudParis
> > CV : http://magnetik.org/fr/curriculum-vitae/
> > Mobile : +33 (0) 6 75 30 15 33
> >
> >
> >
> > 2012/1/21 Peter Williams <home_pw@msn.com>
> >
> > > Use the community group forum for mainstream standardization. As Henry
> > > says, don't use it for webid applications though. Outreach beyond the
> very
> > > pure model (that any standard seeks to specify) should be done where
> its
> > > natural.
> > >
> > > If you want to do micro data and webid, dont do it in w3c webid for
> > > example. It's not welcomed (for standardization purposes). Do do it
> though,
> > > so the message spreads. Promote the literal standard too! The only
> thing
> > > that ultimately matters is: adoption.
> > >
> > > The mark of a good standard is folks still know its name, 30 years
> later.
> > > This means it has the kind of culture that means its fits lots of world
> > > views, not all of which may align 100%.
> > >
> > > Beware of certain w3c downsides, since like any forum it has limits.
> But
> > > at this early stage, it seems the right place to meet.
> > >
> > > Sent from my iPhone
> > >
> > > On Jan 20, 2012, at 5:56 AM, "Henry Story" <henry.story@bblfish.net>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi Jonas,
> > > >
> > > >  thanks for the pointer.
> > > >
> > > > Btw. we just started the W3C WebID Community Group now,
> > > > and it would be great if you joined :-)
> > > >
> > > >   http://www.w3.org/community/webid/
> > > >
> > > > W3C Community Groups should be easy to join, and are a way of
> ensuring
> > > > that for a minimal cost we don't end up with any weird patent
> issues. So
> > > > for everyone who would like  to keep up to date and contribute that
> is
> > > > where things are happening.
> > > >
> > > >    Henry
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On 20 Jan 2012, at 14:45, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> Hi,
> > > >>
> > > >> This looks like a serious effort to provide WebID support for
> Node.js:
> > > >> http://magnetik.github.com/node-webid-report/
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> - Jonas
> > > >>
> > > >> --
> > > >> * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt
> > > >> * Tlf.: +45 40843136  Website: http://dr.jones.dk/
> > > >>
> > > >> [x] quote me freely  [ ] ask before reusing  [ ] keep private
> > > >> _______________________________________________
> > > >> foaf-dev mailing list
> > > >> foaf-dev@lists.foaf-project.org
> > > >> http://lists.foaf-project.org/mailman/listinfo/foaf-dev
> > > >
> > > > Social Web Architect
> > > > http://bblfish.net/
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > foaf-protocols mailing list
> > > > foaf-protocols@lists.foaf-project.org
> > > > http://lists.foaf-project.org/mailman/listinfo/foaf-protocols
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > foaf-protocols mailing list
> > > foaf-protocols@lists.foaf-project.org
> > > http://lists.foaf-project.org/mailman/listinfo/foaf-protocols
> > >
>
>

Received on Thursday, 4 October 2012 12:42:08 UTC