Order - Re: Simple Straw Poll re. Hash URI Specificity and WebID Definition

On 21 Nov 2012, at 17:57, Alexandre Bertails <bertails@w3.org> wrote:

> I'm told that people are "voting" by just answering the ML, with
> non-consistent cross-posting on top of that.
> 
> Can we have more chaos, please? I mean, seriously...
> 
> W3C has some tools (WBS) to setup polls. Also, this must be proposed
> by the chair to have some value.

Thanks for pointing out this WBS tool. I need to look at that.

In the meantime please put arguments up in favour of the options 
in the wiki and against

http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/webid/wiki/WebID_Definition/hash

if you feel that someone's arguments are something you agree on
put your name next to that argument. 

Not everybody is here listening to the mailing lists right now.

Henry 

PS. I did ask twice for an issue to be opened on this on the WebID issue
database btw, but it looks like the work to follow a simple process 
is felt to be worth less time creating a stir on the mailing list.



> 
> Alexandre.
> 
> On 11/21/2012 11:30 AM, Kingsley Idehen wrote:
>> On 11/21/12 11:04 AM, Henry Story wrote:
>>> "Specifically" is not clear.
>>> 
>>> In terms of language we can use MUST, SHOULD etc.
>>> 
>>> So perhaps you can rephrase it in those terms.
>>> 
>>> [1] a WebID MUST be a an HTTP hash uri
>>> [2] a WebID SHOULD be an HTTP hash uri
>>> [3] a WebID SHOULD be any HTTP hash uri
>>> 
>>> in all cases of course we agree that the URI MUST refer to an agent as
>>> described in the current spec.
>>> 
>>> Is this better?
>> 
>> I missed this part in my earlier response. That's fine re. straw poll
>> vote (via email or use of Wiki doc), but corrected to read:
>> 
>> [1] a WebID MUST be a an HTTP hash uri
>> [2] a WebID SHOULD be an HTTP hash uri
>> [3] a WebID SHOULD be any HTTP uri
>> [4] a WebID MUST be an HTTP uri .
>> 
>> 
> 
> 

Social Web Architect
http://bblfish.net/