Re: Testing null transformed glyf and loca

Agreed, good catch!

On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 3:33 PM, Khaled Hosny <khaledhosny@eglug.org> wrote:

> I was wondering why we don’t have tests for null transformed glyf and
> loca tables (transformation version 3), bit it seems to be covered with:
> https://dev.w3.org/webfonts/WOFF2/spec/#conform-mustAcceptAllTransforms
> but its test plan deals only hmtx transformations:
> https://www.w3.org/Fonts/WG/wiki/TestPlan20-UserAgent#
> mustAcceptAllTransforms
> shouldn’t it be extended to cover null transformed glyf and loca?
>
> Regards,
> Khaled
>
>