- From: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2014 00:19:22 +0100
- To: Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org>
- CC: WebFonts WG <public-webfonts-wg@w3.org>, w3t-comm@w3.org, chairs@w3.org
Hello Philippe, The WebFonts Working Group requests approval for first public working draft of the WOFF 2.0 Evaluation Report. This is a non-normative deliverable which we are chartered to produce to demonstrate the need for a WOFF 2.0 and to document the testing that has been done while developing the WOFF 2.0 Specification. The latter will be a normative document, and will be published later (work has started on it). The evaluation report will be updated with experimental results and discussion as work proceeds, to keep the normative specification short and clear. The Evaluation Report will eventiually transition to Working Group Note one WOFF 2.0 Specification becomes a W3C Recommendation. Both deliverables are late. As the evaluation report explains, this was because we pursued a technically promising compression method (LZMA) which turned out to be unsuitable for standardization. We therefore developed, from scratch, a different compression method. * Document title WOFF 2.0 Evaluation Report * URIs Editors draft currently at http://www.w3.org/Fonts/WG/WOFF2ER/ but styled as FPWD due to being prepared for publication. Suggested shortname: WOFF20-ER * estimated publication date Thurs 23 or Tues 28 depending on timing of fpwd approval * The document Abstract and Status sections http://www.w3.org/Fonts/WG/WOFF2ER/#abstract http://www.w3.org/Fonts/WG/WOFF2ER/#status * Record of the decision to request the transition http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webfonts-wg/2014Jan/0014.html * This is not a delta specification. This specification is non-normative. -- Best regards, Chris mailto:chris@w3.org
Received on Wednesday, 22 January 2014 23:19:30 UTC