- From: Sylvain Galineau <sylvaing@microsoft.com>
- Date: Mon, 9 Aug 2010 23:01:33 +0000
- To: "Levantovsky, Vladimir" <Vladimir.Levantovsky@MonotypeImaging.com>, "Tal Leming" <tal@typesupply.com>, WOFF Working Group <public-webfonts-wg@w3.org>
> From: Levantovsky, Vladimir > [mailto:Vladimir.Levantovsky@MonotypeImaging.com] > Sent: Monday, August 09, 2010 2:59 PM > You are right. Technically, it is feasible that one can use HTTP byte > range request to download WOFF header only, then calculate the table > directory size and issue another HTTP byte range request to get the > table directory, then look up the table in question and issue yet > another request, etc. For this to happen, it should at least be > mentioned in the spec. I don't think it is strictly necessary for the spec to mention it unless it is a requirement and goal of the format to be compatible with such scenarios. I don't see it as normatively required, at any rate.
Received on Monday, 9 August 2010 23:02:10 UTC