W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webevents@w3.org > January to March 2013

Re: createTouch uses undefined interface AbstractView

From: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2013 14:03:42 -0400
Message-ID: <5149F9FE.7090304@nokia.com>
To: ext Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
CC: public-webevents@w3.org
On 3/20/13 1:39 PM, ext Boris Zbarsky wrote:
> On 3/20/13 12:47 PM, Arthur Barstow wrote:
>> Boris - I updated the spec per your requests [1], [2].
>> For the purposes of Last Call comment tracking, would you please review
>> the changes and let us know if the changes are OK or not.
> The changes are mostly fine.
> The only one that's not is the change to item().  I think what you 
> want is more like this:
>   returns the Touch at the specified index in the list or null if the
>   index is not less than the length of the list.


> and you want a separate bit of prose either in a section 4.3 or at 
> toplevel in section 4 that says:
>   A TouchList object's supported property indices are the numbers in
>   the range 0 to one less than the length of the list.


> with bonus points for "supported property indices" linking to 
> http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/WebIDL/#dfn-supported-property-indices

Reference to WebIDL added but not a direct link to that definition.

The changeset is <https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/webevents/rev/0edc668e7910>.

> P.S.  An editorial nit: "Return type: getter Touch" is pretty weird; I 
> assume that's being auto-generated by some software that's not 
> actually using a full-fledged WebIDL parser...

Yeah, that's an artifact of ReSpec that I don't know how to fix but I'll 
make sure the "getter" is removed before the spec is copied to w3.org/TR/.

Thanks Boris!

Received on Wednesday, 20 March 2013 18:04:10 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:09:34 UTC