- From: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>
- Date: Wed, 06 Mar 2013 13:23:05 -0500
- To: "ext Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu" <kanghaol@oupeng.com>
- CC: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>, public-webevents@w3.org
On 3/6/13 1:12 PM, ext Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu wrote: > (13/03/07 2:00), Boris Zbarsky wrote: >> On 3/6/13 12:43 PM, Arthur Barstow wrote: >> I sympathize with the concerns about being able to advance, and it may >> be that the W3C process is broken enough that you can't reference >> WindowProxy directly and still take this spec to REC. > I think you can, We'll need to get some input from Doug and/or Philippe here. > or otherwise can someone remind how we got Selectors > API Level 1 to REC? For Selectors API Level 1, all of the W3C normative references are Recommendations so there was no issue with the W3C's so-called "normative reference policy" <http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/REC-selectors-api-20130221/#normative-references>. (The problem arises when W3C normative references for are _not_ Recommendations.) -AB > WebIDL and HTML5 are both at CR right? > > > > Cheers, > Kenny
Received on Wednesday, 6 March 2013 18:23:52 UTC