W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webevents@w3.org > January to March 2013

Re: Adding implementor's note about event targets?

From: Sangwhan Moon <smoon@opera.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Mar 2013 02:44:05 +0900
Cc: "public-webevents@w3.org WG" <public-webevents@w3.org>
Message-Id: <841CE604-D738-4F15-A598-0949633B550A@opera.com>
To: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>
Draft proposal:

User agents must ensure a TouchEvent dispatched from a single
Document origin stays within the Document boundaries.

In the event of the TouchEvent crossing Document boundaries,
only the original Document which the first touchstart event
of a single touch sequence was created will receive consequential
events, and all event targets of the TouchEvent must only expose
event targets within the same document.

I'm not sure where would be the best location for this to be placed -
for now I tacked it in the "List of TouchEvents types" section.

Comments are welcome.

Sangwhan

On Feb 26, 2013, at 11:25 PM, Arthur Barstow wrote:

> Sangwhan - this is one of two comments that is blocking the progression of this spec to Proposed Recommendation [LC-comments].
> 
> Would you please either withdraw your comment or make a specific proposal by March 1?
> 
> -Thanks, ArtB
> 
> [LC-Comments] <http://www.w3.org/2010/webevents/wiki/TouchEvents-LCWD-24-Jan-2013>
> 
> 
> On 1/30/13 1:53 PM, ext Sangwhan Moon wrote:
>> On Jan 30, 2013, at 8:39 PM, Arthur Barstow wrote:
>> 
>>> On 1/30/13 12:17 AM, ext Sangwhan Moon wrote:
>>>> Bumping Art's comment from another place.
>>>> 
>>>> Since there has already been cases where implementations had issues with event targets
>>>> in multiple frame documents, I've been thinking about adding a explicit but non-normative
>>>> implementor's note about event targets since the spec has been re-opened.
>>>> 
>>>> Ideas?
>>> Please make a specific proposal (including where you think it should be inserted in  the spec) and is this a v1 and/or v2 proposal?
>> It should apply to both as it is a bit ambiguous at the moment, I'll write something more
>> specific and where it would probably belong best after giving it some thought.
>> 
> 

-- 
Sangwhan Moon, Opera Software ASA
Received on Thursday, 28 February 2013 17:44:44 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 28 February 2013 17:44:44 GMT