W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webevents@w3.org > January to March 2013

Re: Need test results against Jan 2013 Touch Events LC

From: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2013 07:06:19 -0500
Message-ID: <512CA53B.5020807@nokia.com>
To: ext Sangwhan Moon <smoon@opera.com>, "<Cathy.Chan@nokia.com>" <Cathy.Chan@nokia.com>
CC: public-webevents@w3.org
On 2/26/13 3:30 AM, ext Sangwhan Moon wrote:
> Sorry for falling off the radar regarding this matter - special thanks to Cathy for the work.
>
> In the meanwhile, a fix: https://dl.dropbox.com/u/7479257/createtouchlist.jpg
> ...which is hopefully coming _very_ soon to a handset near you.
>
> Not out yet, I'll update accordingly when it's out.
>
> I've re-tested the ones that were different from the others in case we had some
> bugs regarding this, using the public build downloaded from Google Play on a
> Galaxy Nexus:
>
> https://dl.dropbox.com/u/7479257/multi-touch-interaction.png
> https://dl.dropbox.com/u/7479257/multi-touch-interfaces.png
>
> Should I update the wiki? (Everything else matched the existing test results)

Thanks Sangwhan, this is great news. I think we should update the wiki 
after a version of the browser is publicly available so please let us 
know when it is. (Because we have two or more implementations that pass 
each test, your results are not blocking the spec to progress to 
Proposed Recommendation.)

Cathy - I fixed the typos you mentioned and added a link to the LC.

Rick, Matt, Olli, Others - any comments from you about TEv1 now being 
"PR worthy"? (I'll start a CfC to publish a PR so I'm just looking for 
any issues you see.)

-Art


>
> On Feb 26, 2013, at 6:33 AM, <Cathy.Chan@nokia.com> <Cathy.Chan@nokia.com> wrote:
>
>> A few comments...
>>
>> We should call out that the test data are for the Jan 2013 LCWD. Although
>> there's a link to that, the text that specifically mentions the Dec 2011 CR
>> (about the exit criteria) can be confusing and misleading.
>>
>> The Firefox result was 51 pass + 2 fail in initial my report. Since Matt
>> reported that one of those failures have been fixed in Nightly 22, the final
>> result should be 52 pass + 1 fail.
>>
>> Also, the Opera result should be 52 pass + 1 fail. This seems to be just a
>> typo.
>>
>> Regards, Cathy.
>>
>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Barstow Art (Nokia-CIC/Boston)
>>> Sent: Sunday, February 24, 2013 2:33 PM
>>> To: Matt Brubeck; Chan Cathy (Nokia-CIC/Boston); public-
>>> webevents@w3.org
>>> Subject: Re: Need test results against Jan 2013 Touch Events LC
>>>
>>> Thanks for the data Cathy and Matt.
>>>
>>> It appears we now have at least two implementations that pass each test,
>>> and if so, Touch Events v1 can now proceed directly to Proposed
>>> Recommendation (and skip another Candidate Recommendation).
>>>
>>> Based on the data in this thread, I created an Implementation Report
>>> <http://www.w3.org/2010/webevents/wiki/TEv1ImplReport>.
>>>
>>> Everyone - please review this document and send comments.
>>>
>>> -Thanks, Art
>>>
Received on Tuesday, 26 February 2013 12:08:22 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 26 February 2013 12:08:22 GMT