W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webevents@w3.org > January to March 2013

Re: Comments on Touch Events v1 LCWD

From: Rick Byers <rbyers@google.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2013 10:58:13 -0500
Message-ID: <CAFUtAY9PdRKjZUc=ht+=qQdap3sEwOEQ0RPPRZMWp0cWrVGTVg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu>
Cc: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>, public-webevents@w3.org, Matt Brubeck <mbrubeck@mozilla.com>, "Olli@pettay.fi" <Olli@pettay.fi>, Sangwhan Moon <smoon@opera.com>
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 9:39 AM, Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu> wrote:

> On 1/17/13 8:17 AM, Arthur Barstow wrote:
>
>> On 1/15/13 4:26 PM, ext Cathy.Chan@nokia.com wrote:
>>
>>> 3. The description of createTouchList says
>>> [[Creates a TouchList object consisting of zero or more Touch objects.]]
>>> But the table below says the touches attribute is not nullable. Is that a
>>> contradiction?
>>> What would be the expected behavior if we createTouchList() is called
>>> with
>>> zero Touch objects?
>>> Or should it be restricted to take one or more Touch objects?
>>>
>>
>> Matt, Olli, Boris - what does Gecko do here?
>>
>
> Calling createTouchList with no arguments creates a list with no objects
> in it and length 0.


Same behavior in Chrome (i.e. upstream WebKit - iOS could be different in
theory).


>
> -Boris
>
Received on Thursday, 17 January 2013 15:59:00 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 17 January 2013 15:59:01 GMT