W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webcrypto@w3.org > May 2016

Re: Pull request for IDL testing

From: Eric Roman <ericroman@google.com>
Date: Tue, 17 May 2016 12:48:32 -0700
Message-ID: <CAFswn4k97bOcNLau7PWYJoxKPZPR4qt+YnPvm_424aJ_vuC=vg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Jim Schaad <ietf@augustcellars.com>
Cc: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu>, "public-webcrypto@w3.org" <public-webcrypto@w3.org>
On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 12:40 PM, Jim Schaad <ietf@augustcellars.com> wrote:

>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Boris Zbarsky [mailto:bzbarsky@mit.edu]
> > Sent: Tuesday, May 17, 2016 11:38 AM
> > To: public-webcrypto@w3.org
> > Subject: Re: Pull request for IDL testing
> >
> > On 5/17/16 2:20 PM, Jim Schaad wrote:
> > > Current testing runs have the following results:
> > >
> > > Chrome Canary has 15 fail cases.  These are:
> > > class string of Crypto.prototype expected "[object CryptoPrototype]"
> but got
> > "[object Crypto]"
> > > class string of CryptoKey.prototype expected "[object
> CryptoKeyPrototype]"
> > but got "[object CryptoKey]"
> > > class string of SubtleCrypto.prototype expected "[object
> > SubtleCryptoPrototype]" but got "[object SubtleCrypto]"
> >
> > That's because of
> > https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=28244#c6 I would think.
>
> In that case it falls under the rubric of "expected behavior" and I will
> not worry about it any more
>
> >
> > That doesn't explain the exceptions, though.
>
> I expect that Eric might have some ideas.
>

Thanks Jim.
Do you have a reduced test case I can run?
Could be an issue with Blink's generic WebIDL bindings generator.


>
> >
> > > Mozilla stable passes all tests cleanly when dealing with the window
> > > interface and fails all tests for the worker side with the error
> > > assert_own_property: self does not have own property "Crypto" expected
> > > property "Crypto" missing
> >
> > Web crypto is not available in workers until Firefox 48, which is
> currently the dev
> > edition channel.
>
> I expected that was the case, but I still need to get to the point where I
> can have both the dev and stable versions of Firefox open at the same
> time.  I have found the instructions; I just haven't done them.
>
> Jim
>
> >
> > -Boris
>
>
>
>
Received on Tuesday, 17 May 2016 19:49:00 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 17 May 2016 19:49:00 UTC