W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webcrypto@w3.org > July 2016

Re: Agenda suggestions for meeting *today* on July 11th

From: Charles Engelke <w3c@engelke.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2016 15:13:58 -0400
Message-ID: <CAFeVzdz10gs2w7S2+_FsPeqwEpL3irZ-dmfnBLV9qwTnwZwe8w@mail.gmail.com>
To: Eric Roman <ericroman@google.com>
Cc: Harry Halpin <hhalpin@w3.org>, "public-webcrypto@w3.org" <public-webcrypto@w3.org>
Edge does support 192-bit keys for AES-CBC and AES-GCM (AES-CTR does not
seem to be supported yet). So there may be the necessary two
implementations.

On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 2:29 PM, Eric Roman <ericroman@google.com> wrote:

>
>
> On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 10:29 AM, Harry Halpin <hhalpin@w3.org> wrote:
>
>> Note that the test-suite progress is coming well big +1 to Charles!
>>
>>  I'd like to see the following on the agenda:
>>
>> 1) Test-suite update - is there plans from any of the browser vendors to
>> change support for algorithms/keys. I believe it's 'no' but worth checking
>> -  for example, 192-bit keys in Chrome will be removed from spec unless
>> there is interop.
>>
>
> Confirmed -- there are no plans for changing algorithm/key support in
> Chrome.
> There are no plans for supporting 192-bit AES keys in Chrome
>
>
>> 2) If MarkW can make it, an update to any open issues.
>>
>> 3) In terms of spki/pcks support for WebCrypto, are we happy with either
>> removing or stating lack of interop? Note that we are still waiting for
>> Ryan Hurst's proposal, and we do not have importKey/exportKey in
>> test-suite.
>>
>> 4) We still need clarity on when Service Worker support for WebCrypto on
>> Mozilla will be delivered.
>>
>> 5) It would be great if Apple could devote some cycles and drop their
>> webkit-prefix.
>>
>> 6) Writing up the transition request that takes into account test-suite,
>> closed issues, formal objections - I'm happy to draft this after the
>> meeting, but would like answers on above.
>>
>> Our timing is we want to do the transition request to "Proposed
>> Recommendation" if possible by end of this month, but at latest by end of
>> August.
>>
>>   cheers,
>>      harry
>>
>>
>> On 07/10/2016 11:04 AM, GALINDO Virginie wrote:
>>
>> Dear all.
>> This is a kind reminder that we will have our regular call on monday 11th
>> of July @ 20:00 UTC.
>> Regards,
>> Virginie
>>
>> From my mobile
>>
>>
>> ---- Harry Halpin a écrit ----
>>
>> Just to keep everyone informed, there is no meeting July 4th. We'll
>> reconvene on July 11th, hopefully having a new version of the spec with
>> most open issues resolved, and would like to review the near-complete
>> test-suite with the browser vendors.
>>
>>   cheers,
>>     harry
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>> This message and any attachments are intended solely for the addressees
>> and may contain confidential information. Any unauthorized use or
>> disclosure, either whole or partial, is prohibited.
>> E-mails are susceptible to alteration. Our company shall not be liable
>> for the message if altered, changed or falsified. If you are not the
>> intended recipient of this message, please delete it and notify the sender.
>> Although all reasonable efforts have been made to keep this transmission
>> free from viruses, the sender will not be liable for damages caused by a
>> transmitted virus.
>>
>>
>>
>
Received on Monday, 11 July 2016 19:14:27 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 11 July 2016 19:14:28 UTC