W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webcrypto@w3.org > October 2015

Re: [W3C Web Crypto WG] Review of WebRTC 1.0 from Web Crypto Working Group

From: Ryan Sleevi <sleevi@google.com>
Date: Sun, 25 Oct 2015 00:04:14 -0700
Message-ID: <CACvaWvag4f6iLBApgvyv6QUv3WqoXc2wbNjBeYEQ+byrh8JSYA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Harry Halpin <hhalpin@w3.org>
Cc: GALINDO Virginie <Virginie.Galindo@gemalto.com>, "public-webcrypto@w3.org" <public-webcrypto@w3.org>
Harry, Virginie,

Is there a W3C process for reviews? I'm aware of the TAG-approach of
Markdown'd findings, but I'm also aware that some of these requests are
informally-formal, and simply a call for all members to review, consider,
and offer their own (personal) feedback, such as emails, bug reports, open
issues, etc.

My understanding is that this is the latter camp - for which nothing should
stop Harry from offering feedback, and that feedback may ultimately be
disagreed with w/ other members of the WG; put differently, there is no
need for the WG to formalize consensus of feedback and formally offer it -
it is simply sufficient to review and send away.

Is this a correct understanding from the W3C process perspective?

On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 6:00 AM, Harry Halpin <hhalpin@w3.org> wrote:

> I'm happy to give a review if no-one else wants to.
>
> On 10/23/2015 07:01 AM, GALINDO Virginie wrote:
> > Dear all,
> > Any kind reviewer for that request, specially on the attestation
> signature side ?
> > Regards,
> > Virginie
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Stefan HÃ¥kansson LK [mailto:stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com]
> > Sent: jeudi 15 octobre 2015 11:09
> > To: GALINDO Virginie; public-webcrypto-comments@w3.org
> > Cc: webrtc-chairs@w3.org
> > Subject: Review of WebRTC 1.0 from Web Crypto Working Group
> >
> > Dear Web Crypto Working Group,
> >
> > The WebRTC Working Group is working toward publishing the WebRTC 1.0
> specification to Candidate Recommendation and is thus seeking review from a
> variety of groups on the document:
> > http://w3c.github.io/webrtc-pc/
> >
> > We are particularly interested on feedback on the following aspects from
> the Web Crypto WG:
> > - the management of certificates used to establish the DTLS connections,
> > - the usage and exchange of signed assertions in the identity provider
> mechanism.
> >
> > We of course also welcome feedback on any other aspect of the
> specification.
> >
> > Any such feedback received the week before TPAC would make it possible
> for us to look at it during our F2F there and so would be appreciated.
> > We hope to transition request to Candidate Recommendation by the end of
> this year.
> >
> > If you have any comments, we prefer you submit them as Github issues:
> > https://github.com/w3c/webrtc-pc/issues
> >
> > Alternatively, you can send your comments by email to
> public-webrtc@w3.org.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > For the WebRTC co-chairs,
> > Stefan
> > ________________________________
> >  This message and any attachments are intended solely for the addressees
> and may contain confidential information. Any unauthorized use or
> disclosure, either whole or partial, is prohibited.
> > E-mails are susceptible to alteration. Our company shall not be liable
> for the message if altered, changed or falsified. If you are not the
> intended recipient of this message, please delete it and notify the sender.
> > Although all reasonable efforts have been made to keep this transmission
> free from viruses, the sender will not be liable for damages caused by a
> transmitted virus.
> >
>
>
>
Received on Sunday, 25 October 2015 07:05:26 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Sunday, 25 October 2015 07:05:27 UTC