- From: Richard Barnes <rlb@ipv.sx>
- Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2015 15:52:09 -0400
- To: Harry Halpin <hhalpin@w3.org>
- Cc: "public-webcrypto@w3.org" <public-webcrypto@w3.org>
On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 2:44 PM, Harry Halpin <hhalpin@w3.org> wrote: > > > On 10/06/2015 02:10 PM, Richard Barnes wrote: >> On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 1:41 PM, Ryan Sleevi <sleevi@google.com> wrote: >>> Correct, and I believe Richard was looking at getting someone to implement >>> it for Mozilla 'real soon'; there was just some additional NSS API work that >>> had to happen before they could expose it to WebCrypto, and Firefox's >>> underlying cryptographic library supports it with one or two tweaks. >> Yes, we are working on this in Q4. I would oppose removing RSA-PSS >> from WebCrypto. >> >> Note also that RSA-PSS is a requirement for TLS 1.3. > > Richard, > > Do you think we should delay Rec to get this algorithm? > > If not, do you think its possible to get this out at latest by end of > November? Depends on what you mean by "out". If you mean "landed in Nightly", maybe. If you mean "in release Firefox", no. --Richard > > cheers, > harry > >> >> --Richard >> >> >>> On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 10:32 AM, Eric Roman <ericroman@google.com> wrote: >>>> The meeting notes say that there are no implementations of RSA-PSS: >>>>> No implementations: RSA-PSS, AES-CMAC, AES-CFB, CONCAT >>>> Note that is not correct -- at least the Chrome browser implements RSA-PSS >>>> >>>> >>>> On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 10:20 AM, GALINDO Virginie >>>> <Virginie.Galindo@gemalto.com> wrote: >>>>> Dear all, >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Following our last meeting call, we decided to remove from the normative >>>>> part of our specification the following algorithms for not being implemented >>>>> in at least 2 of the platform tested : RSA-PSS, AES-CMAC, AES-CFB, CONCAT, >>>>> DH. Detailed discussion can be found under >>>>> http://www.w3.org/2015/09/28-crypto-minutes.html. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> This mail is a call for consensus to validate that decision. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Anyone objecting to that decision should make his motivated point before >>>>> the 20th of October at 17:00 UTC. >>>>> >>>>> If this decision is endorsed, the algorithms descriptions will be >>>>> gathered in a dedicated Note. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Regards, >>>>> >>>>> Virginie >>>>> >>>>> Chair of the web crypto WG >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> //please ignore the following statement >>>>> >>>>> ________________________________ >>>>> This message and any attachments are intended solely for the addressees >>>>> and may contain confidential information. Any unauthorized use or >>>>> disclosure, either whole or partial, is prohibited. >>>>> E-mails are susceptible to alteration. Our company shall not be liable >>>>> for the message if altered, changed or falsified. If you are not the >>>>> intended recipient of this message, please delete it and notify the sender. >>>>> Although all reasonable efforts have been made to keep this transmission >>>>> free from viruses, the sender will not be liable for damages caused by a >>>>> transmitted virus. >>>> >
Received on Tuesday, 6 October 2015 19:52:38 UTC