- From: Bruno Oliveira <abstractj@redhat.com>
- Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 07:26:19 -0200
- To: Israel Hilerio <israelh@microsoft.com>, Richard Barnes <rbarnes@mozilla.com>, "public-webcrypto@w3.org" <public-webcrypto@w3.org>, Alexey Proskuryakov <ap@webkit.org>, Ryan Sleevi <sleevi@google.com>
+1 for removal Ryan -- abstractj JBoss, a division of Red Hat On February 13, 2014 at 3:29:21 AM, Ryan Sleevi (sleevi@google.com) wrote: > > Are there any objections for removing SHA-224? > > I note, for example, that Microsoft has chosen not to implement > SHA-224. It provides less security as SHA-256, but at the same > performance cost. > > I'm trying to think of a compelling reason for implementors to > implement SHA-224, and I can't find one, other than for completion > sake. Do we have any use cases for it?
Received on Thursday, 13 February 2014 09:29:40 UTC