Re: Current status of pre-Last Call bugs

All,

I tagged the bugs that are blocking Last Call: http://tinyurl.com/k36896o

If additional bugs should block Last Call, please tag them "prelc".

...Mark


On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 6:42 PM, Mark Watson <watsonm@netflix.com> wrote:

> All,
>
> We had 15 bugs that were identified as needing to be resolved before Last
> Call. The following is a status update since my last mail on these sent
> before the last meeting. I've omitted those that were resolved at the time
> of the last update.
>
>
> *Bug 20611* <https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=20611> -
> Specify the text encoding for JWK key format
>
>
> OPEN - I propose we specify UTF-8, following the JWK specification, unless
> anyone objects.
>
>
> *Bug 22570* <https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=22570> -
> AES-GCM should provide distinct inputs/outputs for the tag
>
>
> ASSIGNED: agreed on 1/27 that the tag will be appended to the ciphertext
>
>
> *Bug 23831* <https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=23831> - add
> HMAC-SHA1 to the list of recommended algorithms
>
>
> RESOLVED FIXED: HMAC-SHA1 added to list of recommended algorithms as
> agreed on 1/27
>
>
> *Bug 23445* <https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=23445> - typo
> with BigInteger?
>
>
> RESOLVED FIXED: according to 1/27 discussion
>
>
> *Bug 23500* <https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=23500> - Raw
> AES access?
>
>
> OPEN - list discussion:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webcrypto/2014Jan/0029.html
>
>
> *Bug 23729* <https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=23729> - Key
> usages future compatibility
>
>
> RESOLVED FIXED: switch to DOMStrings according to 24415
>
>
> *Bug 23503* <https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=23503> -
> Should algorithms (ECC in particular) be extensible?
>
>
> RESOLVED FIXED: switch to DOMStrings according to 24415
>
>
> *Bug 23495* <https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=23495> -
> Should an informative note mention that entropy is expected? (and an
> error defined ?)
>
>
> RESOLVED WORKSFORME.
>
>
> There are in addition the following new bugs. We need to decide which of
> these should be addressed before Last Call:
>
>
> *Bug 24450 <https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=24450>* - JWK
> mapping should say what to do with keys that are invalid per JWK spec
>
>
> OPEN
>
>
> *Bug 24489 <https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=24489>* - Correct
> the mapping of JOSE key_ops to WebCrypto KeyUsage
>
>
> RESOLVED DUPLICATE (24441)
>
>
> *Bug 24457 <https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=24457>* - AES-KW
> can only wrap a JWK key if its serialization happens to be 8*n bytes long
>
>
> OPEN - needs discussion
>
>
> *Bug 24444 <https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=24444>* - Named
> Curve Registry (adding secp256k1)
>
>
> OPEN - needs discussion
>
>
> *Bug 24441 <https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=24441> *- Typos
> in usages to JWK mapping description
>
>
> OPEN - typos fixed, waiting for JOSE to align key_ops names with WebCrypto
>
>
> *Bug **24410* <https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=24410> - Define
> operation procedures for each algorithm
>
>
> OPEN
>
>
> *Bug **24427* <https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=24427> - Make
> all method failures asynchronous
>
>
> OPEN: needs discussion - one positive comment - waiting for other input
>
>
> *Bug **24415* <https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=24415> - Replace
> enums with DOMStrings
>
>
> RESOLVED FIXED
>
>
> ...Mark
>
>
>