W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webcrypto@w3.org > April 2014

Re: Sept 9-10th in Silicon Valley for WebCrypto v.Next Workshop?

From: Wendy Seltzer <wseltzer@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2014 12:00:54 -0400
Message-ID: <534811B6.8080406@w3.org>
To: GALINDO Virginie <Virginie.GALINDO@gemalto.com>, Mike Jones <Michael.Jones@microsoft.com>, Richard Barnes <rlb@ipv.sx>
CC: Harry Halpin <hhalpin@w3.org>, "public-webcrypto@w3.org" <public-webcrypto@w3.org>
That's my understanding as well. We picked dates vacated by FIDO's
decision to move their meeting to October.

Best,
--Wendy

On 04/11/2014 11:45 AM, GALINDO Virginie wrote:
> Mike,
> The FIDO meeting has been switched to a later date, as far as I know.
> Regards,
> Virginie
> 
> 
> From: Mike Jones [mailto:Michael.Jones@microsoft.com]
> Sent: vendredi 11 avril 2014 17:43
> To: Richard Barnes; GALINDO Virginie
> Cc: Harry Halpin; public-webcrypto@w3.org
> Subject: RE: Sept 9-10th in Silicon Valley for WebCrypto v.Next Workshop?
> 
> Those dates are being held for an east coast FIDO meeting, which would be a conflict at least for some Google and Microsoft participants.
> 
> -- Mike
> ________________________________
> From: Richard Barnes<mailto:rlb@ipv.sx>
> Sent: ‎4/‎11/‎2014 7:43 AM
> To: GALINDO Virginie<mailto:Virginie.GALINDO@gemalto.com>
> Cc: Harry Halpin<mailto:hhalpin@w3.org>; public-webcrypto@w3.org<mailto:public-webcrypto@w3.org>
> Subject: Re: Sept 9-10th in Silicon Valley for WebCrypto v.Next Workshop?
> Those dates are currently clear for me.
> 
> On Friday, April 11, 2014, GALINDO Virginie <Virginie.GALINDO@gemalto.com<mailto:Virginie.GALINDO@gemalto.com>> wrote:
> Harry,
> I am fine with it.
> Thanks for that follow up.
> Virginie
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Harry Halpin [mailto:hhalpin@w3.org]
> Sent: vendredi 11 avril 2014 07:18
> To: public-webcrypto@w3.org
> Subject: Sept 9-10th in Silicon Valley for WebCrypto v.Next Workshop?
> 
> Everyone,
> 
>     So we have an offer to host the WebCrypto v.Next workshop Sept 9-10th? Would that work for folks in the Working Group as regards timing? Any conflicts people see?
> 
>         cheers,
>            harry
> 
> 
> 
> This message and any attachments are intended solely for the addressees and may contain confidential information. Any unauthorized use or disclosure, either whole or partial, is prohibited.
> E-mails are susceptible to alteration. Our company shall not be liable for the message if altered, changed or falsified. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, please delete it and notify the sender.
> Although all reasonable efforts have been made to keep this transmission free from viruses, the sender will not be liable for damages caused by a transmitted virus
> 
> ________________________________
> This message and any attachments are intended solely for the addressees and may contain confidential information. Any unauthorized use or disclosure, either whole or partial, is prohibited.
> E-mails are susceptible to alteration. Our company shall not be liable for the message if altered, changed or falsified. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, please delete it and notify the sender.
> Although all reasonable efforts have been made to keep this transmission free from viruses, the sender will not be liable for damages caused by a transmitted virus
> 


-- 
Wendy Seltzer -- wseltzer@w3.org +1.617.715.4883 (office)
Policy Counsel and Domain Lead, World Wide Web Consortium (W3C)
http://wendy.seltzer.org/        +1.617.863.0613 (mobile)
Received on Friday, 11 April 2014 16:00:58 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:17:22 UTC