- From: David Dahl <ddahl@mozilla.com>
- Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2013 13:09:15 -0800 (PST)
- To: Ryan Sleevi <sleevi@google.com>
- Cc: GALINDO Virginie <Virginie.GALINDO@gemalto.com>, public-webcrypto@w3.org, Alex Russell <slightlyoff@google.com>, Anthony Nadalin <tonynad@microsoft.com>
----- Original Message ----- > From: "Ryan Sleevi" <sleevi@google.com> > To: "Anthony Nadalin" <tonynad@microsoft.com> > Cc: "GALINDO Virginie" <Virginie.GALINDO@gemalto.com>, "David Dahl" <ddahl@mozilla.com>, public-webcrypto@w3.org, > "Alex Russell" <slightlyoff@google.com> > Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2013 12:57:59 PM > Subject: Re: DOM Dependency > > In order to remove that dependency, you need to rewrite the spec to > demonstrate an asynchronous interface without using events, as well > as > define an event/task processing model that is wholly consistent with > the existing DOM. > > That is the minimum requirement to removing the dependency, and such > a > significant change would require a lot of review and discussion, and > it would have to be demonstrated that such a rewrite does not create > a > web-developer-hostile API. +1
Received on Tuesday, 26 February 2013 21:09:42 UTC