W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webcrypto@w3.org > February 2013

Re: PROPOSAL: Move Issue-25: How do we provision a globally unique ID (was Re: W3C Web Crypto WG - classifying issues)

From: Ryan Sleevi <sleevi@google.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2013 10:04:22 -0800
Message-ID: <CACvaWvZwnyBs4Cj6yOOwyRS2jrQ-+rBL+Y5StnWD1UzvuegD9A@mail.gmail.com>
To: GALINDO Virginie <Virginie.GALINDO@gemalto.com>
Cc: "public-webcrypto@w3.org" <public-webcrypto@w3.org>, Mark Watson <watsonm@netflix.com>
I still believe we should CLOSE, rather than MOVE, the issue.

Mark, can you confirm this issue is no longer relevant to you, given
the Key Discovery API? I thought this use case was entirely met, and
Netflix was the only one requesting this.

On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 9:49 AM, Ryan Sleevi <sleevi@google.com> wrote:
> Splitting into a separate thread so people can actually follow along:
>
> http://www.w3.org/2012/webcrypto/track/issues/25
>
> On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 6:25 AM, GALINDO Virginie
> <Virginie.GALINDO@gemalto.com> wrote:
>> Dear all,
>>
>>
>>
>> With respect to our discussions during our call this week, I would suggest
>> the following categorization of ISSUES, taking into account the following
>> tools :
>>
>> -          Associate ISSUES with appropriate PRODUCT (and we have 4 products
>> at the moment, the low level PI, the high level API, the use case, the Key
>> Discovery)
>>
>> -          Put some issues in the POSTPONED mode to highlight the fact that
>> it seems to be important for the group, but there is no contribution at the
>> moment.
>>
>>
>>
>> ISSUE-40 : Move ISSUE to product Key Discovery.
>>
>> ISSUE-34 : Remove product reference and Associate POSTPONE state.
>>
>> ISSUE-30 : Associate with Key Discovery product
>>
>> ISSUE-26 : No change, but expecting proposal and change state to POSTPONED,
>> if no contribution in the coming 3 weeks.
>>
>> ISSUE 25 : Associate with Key Discovery product
>>
>> ISSUE 24 : Remove any product associated.
>>
>> ISSUE-19 : No change, but expecting proposal and change state to POSTPONED,
>> if no contribution in the coming 3 weeks.
>>
>> ISSUE-15 : Remove product associated and mark as POSTPONED.
>>
>>
>>
>> This mail does not address the discussion for closing or not issues, but
>> rather classifying it correctly.
>>
>> Discussion about closing issues is under the responsibility of the WG and
>> editors of the product associated (if any).
>>
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Virginie
Received on Thursday, 7 February 2013 18:04:50 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 7 February 2013 18:04:50 GMT