Re: JWK attributes for WebCrypto keys: last call

Sent from my iPhone

On Dec 16, 2013, at 7:32 AM, Ryan Sleevi <sleevi@google.com> wrote:

Were we not waiting to hear from JOSE?

We heard from them that it is ok / intended for others to register new use
values for JWK and they have modified their specification accordingly.

Separately, I have raised the question of whether we should change the
comma-separated string format for multiple use values to an Array. On this
there is no consensus yet, so we should stick with the format in the
proposal and now in the Editor's Draft.

...Mark

On Dec 16, 2013 7:07 AM, "GALINDO Virginie" <Virginie.GALINDO@gemalto.com>
wrote:

>  Dear all,
>
> FYI, as there was no comment to this call, the text proposed by Mark has
> been integrated.
>
> Virginie
>
>
>
> *From:* Mark Watson [mailto:watsonm@netflix.com]
> *Sent:* lundi 2 décembre 2013 17:32
> *To:* public-webcrypto@w3.org
> *Subject:* JWK attributes for WebCrypto keys: last call
>
>
>
> All,
>
>
>
> On our call today we discussed the proposal for this [1] which I revised
> as a result of the email/bug discussion (Comment 12 to [1]). There were no
> further comments on the call and have been no further comments on the list.
>
>
>
> We agreed to send a "last chance" email to the list (that is what this
> is). In the absence of comments we'll add this material to the editor's
> draft.
>
>
>
> ...Mark
>
>
>
> [1] https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=23796
>
> ------------------------------
> This message and any attachments are intended solely for the addressees
> and may contain confidential information. Any unauthorized use or
> disclosure, either whole or partial, is prohibited.
> E-mails are susceptible to alteration. Our company shall not be liable for
> the message if altered, changed or falsified. If you are not the intended
> recipient of this message, please delete it and notify the sender.
> Although all reasonable efforts have been made to keep this transmission
> free from viruses, the sender will not be liable for damages caused by a
> transmitted virus
>

Received on Monday, 16 December 2013 15:37:13 UTC