W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webcrypto@w3.org > November 2012

RE: On optionality

From: GALINDO Virginie <Virginie.GALINDO@gemalto.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2012 18:18:17 +0100
To: Ryan Sleevi <sleevi@google.com>, Mark Watson <watsonm@netflix.com>
CC: Mike Jones <Michael.Jones@microsoft.com>, "public-webcrypto@w3.org" <public-webcrypto@w3.org>
Message-ID: <076ED1F6CB375B4BB5CAE787369136070413A343B227@CROEXCFWP04.gemalto.com>
Ryan, Mark,

What do you think about freezing during 24 hours that topic - before we enter the dangerous zone of having aggressive emails.

I think that all understood that there are different views and interpretations on that topic.  Lets think about ways to move forward.

Chair of the W3C Web Crypto WG

From: Ryan Sleevi [mailto:sleevi@google.com]
Sent: mercredi 28 novembre 2012 17:02
To: Mark Watson
Cc: Mike Jones; public-webcrypto@w3.org
Subject: Re: On optionality

Please go read the PubRules and understand the W3C process.

As stated repeatedly, but continually ignored, no features are being removed.

The inclusion - or absence - of text within the WD is not reflective of consensus of final features or implementation.

Pre-provisioned keys remain as they have since day 1 - under discussion.
Received on Wednesday, 28 November 2012 17:18:55 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:17:14 UTC