W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webcrypto@w3.org > November 2012

RE: On optionality

From: GALINDO Virginie <Virginie.GALINDO@gemalto.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2012 18:18:17 +0100
To: Ryan Sleevi <sleevi@google.com>, Mark Watson <watsonm@netflix.com>
CC: Mike Jones <Michael.Jones@microsoft.com>, "public-webcrypto@w3.org" <public-webcrypto@w3.org>
Message-ID: <076ED1F6CB375B4BB5CAE787369136070413A343B227@CROEXCFWP04.gemalto.com>
Ryan, Mark,

What do you think about freezing during 24 hours that topic - before we enter the dangerous zone of having aggressive emails.

I think that all understood that there are different views and interpretations on that topic.  Lets think about ways to move forward.

Regards,
Virginie
Chair of the W3C Web Crypto WG



From: Ryan Sleevi [mailto:sleevi@google.com]
Sent: mercredi 28 novembre 2012 17:02
To: Mark Watson
Cc: Mike Jones; public-webcrypto@w3.org
Subject: Re: On optionality


Please go read the PubRules and understand the W3C process.

As stated repeatedly, but continually ignored, no features are being removed.

The inclusion - or absence - of text within the WD is not reflective of consensus of final features or implementation.

Pre-provisioned keys remain as they have since day 1 - under discussion.
Received on Wednesday, 28 November 2012 17:18:55 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:17:14 UTC