- From: Wan-Teh Chang <wtc@google.com>
- Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2012 19:32:59 -0700
- To: Vijay Bharadwaj <Vijay.Bharadwaj@microsoft.com>
- Cc: "public-webcrypto@w3.org" <public-webcrypto@w3.org>
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 6:03 PM, Vijay Bharadwaj <Vijay.Bharadwaj@microsoft.com> wrote: > True. I was thinking about this from the perspective of what the browser needs > to do to help with access control of the key. My thinking was that in #2 there > was no persisted object to control access to. But your formulation works as well. Ah, I see. You assume the keys produced by key agreement procedures are "session" (non-persistent) keys. Thank you for the clarification Wan-Teh
Received on Thursday, 14 June 2012 02:33:28 UTC