W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webcrypto-comments@w3.org > November 2014

Re: JWK import feature not described in the WebCrypto Draft

From: Anders Rundgren <anders.rundgren.net@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2014 08:08:32 +0100
Message-ID: <5461B5F0.3000203@gmail.com>
To: Ryan Sleevi <sleevi@google.com>
CC: public-webcrypto-comments@w3.org
On 2014-11-11 07:55, Ryan Sleevi wrote:
>
> It is perfectly described as far as what the spec goes, to the same degree at least that none of the implementations support RSA keys that are not multiples of 8 bits, or that some only support keys of certain sizes.
>

I see, you mean that it is up to each implementer to decide if JWK's SHOULD is to be interpreted as a MUST?

Anders

> On Nov 10, 2014 7:12 PM, "Anders Rundgren" <anders.rundgren.net@gmail.com <mailto:anders.rundgren.net@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>     http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/jose/current/msg04661.html
>
>     That is, JWK's SHOULD regarding "p", "q", "dp", "dq", "qi" has in WebCrypto been interpreted as a MUST.
>     This can't be entirely obvious neither for implementers nor users.
>
>     Anders
>
Received on Tuesday, 11 November 2014 07:09:03 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:03:29 UTC