W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webcrypto-comments@w3.org > January 2013

re: Prioritization of secondary features

From: Anders Rundgren <anders.rundgren@telia.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2013 08:37:27 +0100
Message-ID: <510A1F37.9070803@telia.com>
To: "public-webcrypto-comments@w3.org" <public-webcrypto-comments@w3.org>
CC: Mountie Lee <mountie.lee@gmail.com>
Hi Mountie & list,

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webcrypto/2013Jan/0081.html

I agree that this is important.

I believe though that the individual items would gain by slightly more "meat" including a connection to use-cases.

Multiple key containers: Although key-containers is my favorite subject there's actually a virtual *ocean* dividing *using* keys and *enrolling* keys unless we are continuing on the path which has [rightfully] been shunned by the market such as W3C's <keygen>:

    http://www.w3.org/TR/html-markup/keygen.html

Disrespecting the fact that the Web Crypto WG doesn't seem to enjoy this topic, I'm 100% sure that the Google wallet doesn't use anything like <keygen>, CMP or similar PKIX-related protocols.  Presumably for a reason...

Thanx
Anders
Received on Thursday, 31 January 2013 07:38:01 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 31 January 2013 07:38:02 GMT