-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 10/13/2012 12:08 AM, Anders Rundgren wrote: > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webcrypto/2012Oct/0066.html > > Because this what the plugin folks all over the world actually do, I concur with Mountie: "The time is NOW". > > There is (as you should know by now) also a proposal for this. It's incompatible with most vendors' cryptographic platforms but that may be the price to pay when you want (?) to challenge proprietary one-purpose solutions with standards. Nobody said it was easy either :-) > > David, since you initiated the "web crypto craze", what's your take on this? Anders: Are you referring to your proposal? Is Mountie familiar with it? As far as supporting certs in the spec, with the low-level API it seems natural to do so, however, this is definitely not a primary issue to resolve in the near term. Cheers, David -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJQfDJdAAoJEJfYh8Nd7p0f0roH/09CJ+wojUl+U1opzcRJUlCV bRIbpG0TlxADmk16WlcXZqdWAXzE90IXcGqd4rv3dK+KZ5sOWSnaQziyNnjqXFGw KqpiD6u7Jl23HQ+IaePzgELPxbbDRqzFSLVaqaVN341nOGI6vKz4dJGWGk0H1g07 IOsBaAiDN3fZNzndt5bkuZYc7tZ0IGmgcMQMCkpIPwK0lN5FM0ELGwih1LRMvb7Q FsPMs7fWaB2+bSQ5QgNMbJyaP1tdSBANAog/KxYN0Qrjq7nYZ2JcsVhWs1p3q6nz d4/IKf2JHsNjvfaMcgdVE+35uAhQEkjirYPZ73Mij/VaIe3OG1EfzVieaWc3UX8= =fxM6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Monday, 15 October 2012 15:57:51 UTC