W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webcgm-wg@w3.org > September 2009

Re: Thierry -- bug (wrong URI) on cover page!

From: Thierry Michel <tmichel@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 18:43:13 +0200
Message-ID: <4AAE72A1.8010104@w3.org>
To: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
CC: WebCGM WG <public-webcgm-wg@w3.org>


Lofton Henderson wrote:
> Thierry,
> 
> There is a bug on the cover page, Overview.html, in ../TR/...  The URI 
> for the zip file is not a relative URI, but it is an absolute URI 
> pointing to the zip file that resides in our working directory:
> http://www.w3.org/Graphics/WebCGM/2009/WebCGM21/CR/WebCGM21-20090915.zip


Arrrg ...
that explains why David was not seeing the updated DTD ...

> 
> That zip file contains neither the recent changes to Overview.html, nor 
> to WebCGM21-XCF.html.

OK

> 
> I have fetched the zip file that resides at our publication location in 
> ../TR/..  I have verified that its contents are correct.

So did I !

> 
> So before publication:  fix the absolute URI reference to the ZIP file 
> in Overview.html:  href="WebCGM21-20090915.zip".  (And remember to put 
> the corrected Overview.html back into the zip file.)


Done, I have changed the link in the Overview.html:
the URI is now relative href="WebCGM21-20090915.zip"

and I have also updated the zip file with this new overview page

Tyhanks for this good catch.

Thierry


> 
> Thanks,
> -Lofton.
> 
> At 08:34 AM 9/14/2009 -0700, David Cruikshank wrote:
>> I downloaded the  zip file again and didn't see the change made in
>> WebCGM21-XCF.html??
>>
>> thx..Dave
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 6:55 AM, Lofton Henderson 
>> <lofton@rockynet.com> wrote:
>> > Thanks Thierry!
>> >
>> > It is nicer to fix it now rather than after CR / before PR, I think.
>> >
>> > -Lofton.
>> >
>> > At 09:50 AM 9/14/2009 +0200, Thierry Michel wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Lofton,
>> >>
>> >> I have added the  quote (") at the end of the definition of the
>> >> styleProperties ENTITY.
>> >> see
>> >>
>> >> 
>> http://www.w3.org/Graphics/WebCGM/2009/WebCGM21/CR/WebCGM21-XCF.html#complete-dtd 
>>
>> >>
>> >> the partial DTD
>> >> <!ENTITY % styleProperties
>> >> .....
>> >>
>> >> was OK
>> >> see
>> >>
>> >> 
>> http://www.w3.org/Graphics/WebCGM/2009/WebCGM21/CR/WebCGM21-XCF.html#notation 
>>
>> >>
>> >> the external DTD was also OK
>> >> see
>> >> http://docs.oasis-open.org/webcgm/v2.1/webcgm21.dtd
>> >>
>> >> Also have updated the Zip file
>> >>
>> >> Thierry.
>> >>
>> >> Lofton Henderson wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> Thierry,
>> >>> Dave Cruikshank has found a little glitch, whereby the spec's in-line
>> >>> copy of the XCF DTD differs from the external file copy...
>> >>> ...a single missing double quote (") at the end of the definition 
>> of the
>> >>> styleProperties ENTITY.
>> >>> It is probably too late to fix this now?
>> >>> Can we fix it for the post-CR version (the PR version), claiming 
>> that it
>> >>> is an editorial error?  (After all, Dave says the external file 
>> copy of the
>> >>> DTD is correct.)
>> >>> -Lofton.
>> >>>
>> >>>> Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2009 09:30:02 -0700
>> >>>> Subject: Re: xcf dtd
>> >>>> From: David Cruikshank <dvdcruikshank@gmail.com>
>> >>>> To: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
>> >>>> [...]
>> >>>> 2) there is a missing double quote -"- at the end of the
>> >>>> styleProperties ENTITY in the spec version of the dtd.  This is a
>> >>>> problem since now the spec version is invalid.  There should be a 
>> -"-
>> >>>> after the last IMPLIED an before the close angle bracket.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> sorry for finding this...
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Dave
>> >>>>
>> >>>> On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 4:20 PM, Lofton Henderson 
>> <lofton@rockynet.com>
>> >>>> wrote:
>> >>>> > At 01:37 PM 9/10/2009 -0700, David Cruikshank wrote:
>> >>>> >>
>> >>>> >> Lofton,
>> >>>> >>
>> >>>> >> where can I find the current "good" copy of the xcf DTD for 
>> WebCGM
>> >>>> >> 2.1?
>> >>>> >
>> >>>> > This is the spec that will publish Tuesday (so don't publicize 
>> this
>> >>>> > URI
>> >>>> > yet):
>> >>>> > http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/CR-webcgm21-20090915/
>> >>>> >
>> >>>> > Our redundant checking should have ensured that the in-line DTD in
>> >>>> > Ch.4 is
>> >>>> > the same as the external DTD at the System Identifier, and both 
>> should
>> >>>> > have
>> >>>> > no known errors.  (So let me know if that is now correct!)
>> >>>> >
>> >>>> > -Lofton.
>> >>>> >
>> >>>> >
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> >
> 
Received on Monday, 14 September 2009 16:43:39 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 14 September 2009 16:43:39 GMT