W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webcgm-wg@w3.org > June 2009

Re: [2nd LC Review] Comments

From: Thierry Michel <tmichel@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 13:45:46 +0200
Message-ID: <4A3F6EEA.40609@w3.org>
CC: WebCGM WG <public-webcgm-wg@w3.org>
Here is our first LC comment.
Unfortunately this comment seem to be out of scope, as we are requesting 
comments only on the differences between this second Last Call Working 
Draft and the First Public and Last Call Working Draft.

For XML Schema and/or Relax NG schema, unless someone wants to provide 
one ;-)
we should probably say that yes it is a good idea, but we don't have the 
ressource for such work and it is not required by the W3C to release 
such Schema.

Thoughts ?


Innovimax SARL wrote:
> Dear,
> First congratulations for your 2.1 version
> I want to spot some improvement that I wanted to be incorporated in this version
> == moving forward with XML Schema or Relax NG ==
> Sticking to DTD to define a XML dialect is neither sufficient neither
> a way to widespread the use of this XML dialect. For that, I ask the
> WG to consider providing normative XML Schema and/or Relax NG schema
> of the XCF model. It will help adoption especially because XCF uses
> Namespaces.
> == interaction between WebCGM and CSS ==
> Is it possible to consider the role that could play CSS vis  vis WebCGM ?
> Regards,
> Mohamed ZERGAOUI
Received on Monday, 22 June 2009 11:46:21 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:23:41 UTC