W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webcgm-wg@w3.org > June 2009

Do we need a telecon Wednesday?

From: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 14:21:58 -0600
Message-Id: <>
To: WebCGM WG <public-webcgm-wg@w3.org>
All --

Because it is indeed quiet on this (WG) side of the project now, and the 
action is mostly elsewhere for a couple more weeks, I'm wondering if we 
need a WG telecon Wednesday (tomorrow)?

I may be overlooking some topic on which we need to and can productively 
spend some time, and am happy to meet and cofer if so.

But if no one has such a topic this time, I'd prefer that people (esp. 
implementors) spend the morning to work on any outstanding actions they 
might have.  (I have outstanding data requests to implementors, so that I 
can produce the first populated draft of the 2.1 Implementation Report.)



At 07:50 PM 6/16/2009 +0200, Thierry Michel wrote:
>Thanks you for your efforts.
>If you need any help to produce the WebCGM 2.1 Implementation Report, 
>please let me  know.
>Henderson a écrit :
>>All --
>>As you notice, things are pretty quiet in the WG lately -- we got the 2nd 
>>LCWD review prepared and launched a couple weeks ago, to close on 02 July.
>>Meanwhile, over in the TC, a first *raw* release [1] of the new tests for 
>>WebCGM 2.1 has been made.  I characterize it as "raw" because it 
>>comprises only the additional tests required for new 2.1 features, and it 
>>has not yet been fully integrated with the released 2.0 test suite 
>>(comprising 1.0 tests and 2.0 tests).  On the other hand, all of the new 
>>40+ tests have gone through a rigorous development and independent review 
>>process, and are approved by the TC for publication.  They are suitable 
>>for use by 2.1 implementors.
>>This is a temporary publication, and temporary location.  A permanent 
>>location will be available soon, after the initial integration into a 
>>full 2.1 Test Suite is finished.
>>I have also produced a skeleton document and started the process to 
>>gather actual data for an initial draft of the WebCGM 2.1 Implementation 
>>Report.  More specifically, to gather an initial snapshot about the four 
>>implementors' statuses on the new tests of the WebCGM 2.1 test suite.
>>As soon as I have assembled this initial snapshot, this document *will* 
>>become a WG document, to be developed and refined here until we exit 
>>CR.  (Stay tuned for the initial snapshot, in the near future, as soon as 
>>I have gotten initial responses from all the implementors.)
>>This document should provide a foundation for:  preliminary goals & 
>>agenda planning for Ann Arbor; refinement of our anticipated time line to 
>>our CR-Exit milestone.
Received on Tuesday, 16 June 2009 20:22:48 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:23:41 UTC