W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webcgm-wg@w3.org > July 2009

Re: LCWD comment responses approved

From: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2009 10:40:08 -0600
Message-Id: <>
To: tmichel@w3.org
Cc: WebCGM WG <public-webcgm-wg@w3.org>
Thierry --

Thanks for your work on this.  The DoC looks good.

Thanks also for your work on the draft reply message to Innovax.  I'll send 
that shortly (after you & I sort out that small format issue that I wrote 
to you about).


At 12:49 PM 7/28/2009 +0200, Thierry Michel wrote:
>I have updated the Disposition of comments, it now shows the 2 LCs.
>I have included the comment sent by Innovax.
>Henderson a écrit :
>>Thierry --
>>What's next for the two comments?  As I recall, we incorporate them and 
>>the replies into a Disposition of Comments (DoC) document, send it to 
>>commenter, and ask him to approve the disposition.
>>Does that DoC document need to be a new and separate document for 
>>LCWD2?  Or is it a cumulative document, with all comments from all prior 
>>reviews included, or what?  (I can do this if you will clarify what ... 
>>"new" or "cumulative".)
>>At 04:46 PM 7/27/2009 -0600, Lofton Henderson wrote:
>>>All --
>>>For the record, the WG unanimously approved [1] & [2] as the WG 
>>>responses to the two comments from "Mohamed ZERGAOUI" of Innovimax SARL.
>>>The 7 affirmative replies are:    [...snip...]
Received on Tuesday, 28 July 2009 16:40:56 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:23:42 UTC