W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webcgm-wg@w3.org > July 2009

Re: LCWD comment responses approved

From: Thierry Michel <tmichel@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2009 11:42:58 +0200
Message-ID: <4A6EC822.6050600@w3.org>
To: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
CC: WebCGM WG <public-webcgm-wg@w3.org>
Lofton,

The procedure for the 2 comments is:

1- We send to the commenters the resolution of the WebCGM WG and ask him 
to approuve our response.
(here is a template)
2- We add into  the disposition of comment  [2] with the 2 new comments 
of this second Last Call

[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webcgm/2008Dec/0005.html
[2] http://www.w3.org/Graphics/WebCGM/WG/2008/WebCGM21-LC-comments.html

Thierry.








 Henderson a écrit :
> Thierry --
>
> What's next for the two comments?  As I recall, we incorporate them 
> and the replies into a Disposition of Comments (DoC) document, send it 
> to commenter, and ask him to approve the disposition.
>
> Does that DoC document need to be a new and separate document for 
> LCWD2?  Or is it a cumulative document, with all comments from all 
> prior reviews included, or what?  (I can do this if you will clarify 
> what ... "new" or "cumulative".)
>
> Thanks,
> -Lofton.
>
> At 04:46 PM 7/27/2009 -0600, Lofton Henderson wrote:
>> All --
>>
>> For the record, the WG unanimously approved [1] & [2] as the WG 
>> responses to the two comments from "Mohamed ZERGAOUI" of Innovimax SARL.
>>
>> The 7 affirmative replies are:    [...snip...]
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webcgm-wg/2009Jul/0019.html
>
>
Received on Tuesday, 28 July 2009 09:43:45 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 28 July 2009 09:43:45 GMT